文章名稱引用次數(shù)

• Association between prospective registration and overall reporting and methodological quality of systematic reviews: a meta-epidemiological study54
• A taxonomy has been developed for outcomes in medical research to help improve knowledge discovery38
• Minimum clinically important differences in chronic pain vary considerably by baseline pain and methodological factors: systematic review of empirical studies29
• Preferred reporting items for overviews of systematic reviews including harms checklist: a pilot tool to be used for balanced reporting of benefits and harms23
• Scoping review identifies significant number of knowledge translation theories, models, and frameworks with limited use18
• GRADE guidelines: 20. Assessing the certainty of evidence in the importance of outcomes or values and preferences-inconsistency, imprecision, and other domains18
• GRADE guidelines: 22. The GRADE approach for tests and strategies-from test accuracy to patient-important outcomes and recommendations17
• The selection of comparators for randomized controlled trials of health-related behavioral interventions: recommendations of an NIH expert panel17
• Measurement error is often neglected in medical literature: a systematic review15
• Interpretation of epidemiologic studies very often lacked adequate consideration of confounding13